• p.24, Eq.(2.13): the symbol M should be twice underlined
  
• Chapter 16: on some occasions the word bimodal is perhaps better replaced by crater-like or annular (still looking for a proper name of these strange distribution functions)
• p.214, Eqs.(12.15),(12.16): the epsilon in both equations should have been printed in boldface. Apparently this is due to a problem in compiling the original Latex code, so it cannot be excluded that similar errors with single symbols occur at other places in the book.
  
• Section 12.3.2 and paragraph 2 on p.225: The so-called Nose-Poincare Hamiltonian (Laird, Leimkuhler et al., 1999/2003) is actually identical with the one reported earlier by Dettmann and Morriss (1997), see the book by Hoover (1999) for details. It is also suggested that the efficiency of the so-called Nose-Poincare method is relatively poor (Hoover, private communication, 2007). - Thanks to Bill Hoover for these remarks.
• Bibliography: very unfortunately, it seems that many of the `backreference' page numbers in the bibliography were printed incorrectly. Presumably this is due to the publisher having added two blank pages after two chapters to the original manuscript without updating the backreferences accordingly. As far as I can see, the backreferences are correct up to, say, page 200. After page 200 please add 2 pages to all backreference page numbers.